UWP Lecturers Draft of Engl 1C alternatives

[sbaringer at gmail.com]

Julie

At this late date, and considering it's election night, I can't respond to
this at length right now, but I know there is a great degree of interest
among at least a few existing lecturers in proposing specific courses under 
the pathway 2
model.  Please advise us how we can do this.

- Sandy Baringer

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <juliab at ucr.edu>
To: "listserv" <englecturers at lists.ucr.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 2:43 PM
Subject: UWP Lecturers Draft of Engl 1C alternatives


> Hello Lecturers,
>
> As one of your Lecturer Representatives, and as a member of the UWP ad-hoc
> committee on Writing Across the Curriculum, I want to give you an update
> on the proposed WAC alternatives to English 1C. My intention here is to
> try to continue some of the discussion of 1C that began at the Pedagogical
> Society meeting a couple of weeks ago.
>
> I've attached here a few paragraphs from the latest draft of legistlation
> for the proposed alternatives to English 1C, which the larger UWP program
> committee will be discussing tomorrow (Wednesday). These particular
> paragraphs outline the three proposed "pathways" for students to take to
> satisfy the third quarter of the university writing requirement, and
> suggest what might be involved in training TAs in other departments and in
> approving courses as writing intensive alternatives.
>
> If you have any concerns that you would like me (or Keith Vance) to bring
> to the table tomorrow, please let us know via email.  I apologize for the
> late notice.  The committee is still working on final language, although
> we're running up against a deadline.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Julie Brett
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


> _______________________________________________
> Englecturers mailing list
> Englecturers at lists.ucr.edu
> http://lists.ucr.edu/mailman/listinfo/englecturers
>