<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3059" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY><FONT color=#800080><B><BR><BR></FONT><FONT color=#008000>The Nation, 3
April 07<BR><BR></FONT><FONT color=#0435b5>Historian wants country called
'Siam'<BR><BR></FONT>A historian of Southeast Asian studies has launched a "Siam
not Thailand" campaigning, urging constitution drafters to revert to the name
used in the Kingdom's first constitution.</B> <BR><BR>"People who have been part
of our country have different ethnic, linguistic and cultural identities.
Therefore, to reflect historical fact and the present reality, the name of the
country should be Siam, not Thailand," <FONT color=#ff0000><B>historian Charnvit
Kasetsiri </B></FONT>wrote in an open letter issued yesterday. <BR><BR>The
country's first constitution, promulgated in 1932, used Siam as the country's
name, but in 1939 Prime Minister Field Marshal Phibul changed this to Thailand
"for racist reasons", Charnvit said. <BR><BR>"The government deems it is
appropriate following the new fashion to change the name of our country to fit
the race and the liking of the people," said the government statement in 1939.
<BR><BR>The name "Thailand" does not fit with historical or present facts as
there are more than 40 ethnic groups in the country, including Chinese, Tai,
Hmong, Akha, Karen, Laotians, Khmer and Mon, said Charnvit, a senior advisor and
lecturer at Thammasat University's Southeast Asian Studies Programme.
<BR><BR><FONT color=#ff0000><B>Constitution drafters discussed the issue of
renaming the Kingdom in 1949 and 1968. <BR><BR></B></FONT>"To reflect the
reality about races, languages and cultural identities, the 2007 constitution
should make Siam the official name of the country in order to promote
reconciliation and acceptance of ethnic and cultural diversities, as well as for
the benefit of the country and its people," Charnvit said. <BR><BR>The historian
asked people who agreed with his proposal to write to the constitution drafters
and concerned parties.<BR></BODY></HTML>